0:00:00.000,0:00:07.599 Following the theoretical lecture on meat quality evaluation, we will now show several examples. 0:00:07.599,0:00:16.597 The presentation is part of Module 4: Precision Livestock Farming, which is a part of the ISAGREED project. 0:00:16.597,0:00:25.595 This presentation was supported by the Erasmus+ KA2 Cooperation Partnerships Grant 0:00:25.595,0:00:30.794 "Innovation of the content and structure of study programs in the field 0:00:30.794,0:00:36.160 of management of animal genetic and food resources using digitalization." 0:00:36.160,0:00:47.158 As already mentioned in the theoretical lecture, it is important to determine the fat and muscle content in the carcass. 0:00:47.158,0:00:54.690 Various instrument methods are used for this purpose; injection probes are often used, 0:00:54.690,0:01:00.355 such as the fat o meter, which you can see in the first picture. 0:01:02.355,0:01:10.353 Using this device, the back fat thickness and the Musculus longissimus dorsi muscle thickness 0:01:10.353,0:01:13.819 were determined in 20 pig carcasses. 0:01:13.819,0:01:20.818 At the same time, the lean meat content was determined by dissection of the same carcasses. 0:01:20.818,0:01:23.951 The input data is shown in this table. 0:01:27.950,0:01:35.948 Our task will be to find out whether the back fat thickness and the muscle thickness correlate with the lean meat content and, 0:01:35.948,0:01:43.947 therefore, whether it is possible to use these measured values to predict the lean meat content in the carcass. 0:01:44.946,0:01:52.412 We will solve the task using multivariate correlation and regression analysis. 0:01:52.412,0:01:58.411 In this case, we will choose the lean meat content as the dependent variable; 0:01:58.411,0:02:03.410 the independent variables will be the measured characteristics, 0:02:03.410,0:02:07.575 i.e., the back fat thickness and the muscle thickness. 0:02:07.575,0:02:17.873 Correlation analysis will first allow us to assess the relationship between the dependent and two independent variables. 0:02:17.873,0:02:23.339 The strength of this relationship is given by the correlation coefficient, 0:02:23.339,0:02:33.170 denoted by the lowercase letter r, whose absolute value ranges between 0 and 1. 0:02:33.170,0:02:40.169 The higher the value of the correlation coefficient, the stronger the relationship. 0:02:40.169,0:02:44.768 We say that the variables (or traits) are correlated. 0:02:44.768,0:02:51.500 That means if independent variables change, the dependent variable will change as well. 0:02:51.500,0:03:00.165 Subsequent regression analysis will allow us to mathematically describe the detected relationship. 0:03:00.165,0:03:10.396 Here, we see a regression equation where y is the dependent variable; in our case, the lean meat content, 0:03:10.396,0:03:18.395 x1, x2 are the independent variables, the back fat thickness and the muscle thickness, 0:03:18.395,0:03:26.393 and b1, b2 are regression coefficients, indicating the change in the dependent variable, 0:03:26.393,0:03:30.392 when the independent variable changes by one unit. 0:03:30.392,0:03:36.824 The intercept does not have a direct biological interpretation, 0:03:36.824,0:03:44.823 but it is important for the correct mathematical description of the relationship in the equation. 0:03:45.823,0:03:50.222 We can use, for example, the MS EXCEL for these calculations. 0:03:50.222,0:04:02.719 In the sheet where we have already written down the input data, we choose the option Data, 0:04:02.719,0:04:15.717 then select Data Analysis from the toolbar, choose Regression from the menu, and confirm with the OK button. 0:04:19.016,0:04:25.715 In the following dialog window, we enter the data from which we want to calculate the regression. 0:04:25.715,0:04:37.413 As the input area Y, we choose the column where the values of the dependent variable LMP 0:04:37.413,0:04:41.878 (that is the lean meat content) are listed. 0:04:41.878,0:04:52.543 As the input area X, we select and mark both columns with the values of independent variables 0:04:52.543,0:05:00.208 (that is, the measured values of back fat thickness and muscle thickness). 0:05:00.208,0:05:10.206 After confirming with the OK button, the results will be displayed on the new sheet. 0:05:14.205,0:05:24.537 The high correlation coefficient r = 0.82 indicates a close relationship between the lean meat content 0:05:24.537,0:05:30.669 and both independent variables, back fat thickness and muscle thickness. 0:05:30.669,0:05:37.667 The coefficient of determination shows us the proportion of variability 0:05:37.667,0:05:43.166 of the dependent variable explained by the selected regression model. 0:05:43.166,0:05:51.498 The value of 66% is relatively high and shows that the given model was well designed, 0:05:51.498,0:05:58.697 which is also confirmed by the very low significance value of the F statistic. 0:06:01.029,0:06:07.695 To construct the regression equation, we find in the results the values of the necessary parameters, 0:06:07.695,0:06:15.860 the intercept (61.92), and both regression coefficients 0:06:15.860,0:06:28.857 - for the back fat thickness, the regression coefficient is -0.97 (we insert it into the equation as b1) 0:06:28.857,0:06:44.521 and for the muscle thickness, the regression coefficient is 0. 24 (we insert it into the equation as b2). 0:06:44.521,0:06:51.319 Here we already see the whole assembled equation that tells us that 0:06:51.319,0:07:12.449 Lean meat content equals 61,92 – 0,97*back fat thickness + 0,24*muscle thickness. 0:07:12.449,0:07:22.613 By substituting the measured values of back fat thickness and muscle thickness into the regression equation, 0:07:22.613,0:07:30.012 we can theoretically calculate the estimates of the lean meat content for all 20 cases. 0:07:30.012,0:07:39.410 Here, we see a comparison of the estimate and the exact values of the lean meat content in individual carcasses. 0:07:39.410,0:07:48.075 The last column of the table shows the so-called residuals, or the differences 0:07:48.075,0:07:54.407 between the exact and estimated values of lean meat content. 0:07:54.407,0:08:02.672 Positive values mean that our estimate was slightly lower than the exact measured value, 0:08:02.672,0:08:12.670 and vice versa; negative values indicate an overestimation compared to reality. 0:08:15.670,0:08:21.668 Since we have already verified through the analysis that it is possible to estimate 0:08:21.668,0:08:27.001 the lean meat content with relatively high reliability based on 0:08:27.001,0:08:34.199 the measured back fat thickness and muscle thickness, we can move on to task 2. 0:08:35.199,0:08:42.064 Based on the previous calculation, we have to estimate what the lean meat content will be for a carcass, 0:08:42.064,0:08:45.064 for which the following values were measured: 0:08:45.064,0:08:53.995 Back fat thickness equals 15 mm Muscle thickness equals 62 mm 0:08:53.995,0:09:00.594 We can calculate the lean meat content by substituting the measured values 0:09:00.594,0:09:06.093 into the regression equation and adding up the value of y. 0:09:06.093,0:09:15.091 A lean meat content of approximately 63 % can be expected on this carcass. 0:09:18.091,0:09:22.090 Finally, we will summarize the content of this presentation. 0:09:22.090,0:09:28.422 The multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate lean meat content. 0:09:28.422,0:09:39.420 Back fat and muscle thickness, which can be measured relatively easily, were considered independent variables. 0:09:39.420,0:09:45.419 The assembled regression model with two independent variables 0:09:45.419,0:09:50.218 allowed a very accurate estimation of lean meat content. 0:09:50.218,0:10:02.782 The correlation coefficient equals 0.82; the coefficient of determination equals 0.67 or 67 %. 0:10:02.782,0:10:07.514 However, since this is a statistical analysis, 0:10:07.514,0:10:14.513 verifying the results on a more significant number of observations would be necessary. 0:10:15.513,0:10:23.511 At this moment I would like to thank you for your attention and if you have any questions, use the e-mail listed here.